When some idea or other becomes a buzzword, especially if it sounds impressive or alarming, it is time to stay calm, take a deep breath, and think about it. ‘Quiet diplomacy’, ‘western plot’, ‘National Development Plan’, ‘innocent until proven guilty’, are buzzwords that served the African National Congress’s political purposes in the past. Now the party has a dire warning for us of ‘state capture’.
State capture refers to the control of the state by substantial private interests, the state thereby losing its independence and the power to legislate and act for all.
the 1789 Revolution provides a good example of state capture: the state was hobbled
by a privileged untaxed aristocracy that meant it had to raise money by selling
state offices to a rising business class. France
As a modern example of state capture, the left like to point to the
, the state there having lost much
of its freedom of action to pressure groups. The NRA is the best known among
very many. USA
State capture in this sense is not the condition of
; it is a buzzword here. It asks South
Africans to believe an affluent business family, the Guptas, appoint and remove
cabinet ministers at will, and generally run the Republic without the knowledge
and say-so of its ANC president. Since that is evidently impossible, it is
necessary to look at who has most to gain from this fiction. It cannot be the
Guptas, who are likely to end up scapegoats. It certainly will not be President
Zuma. That leaves the party. South
We must never forget
a party-state and the governing ANC is there to remain in power. No political
organization manages that by sticking rigidly to principles or individuals. The
ANC’s priority always is to shelve or smother issues that could divide or even ultimately
destroy it like other African liberation parties. South Africa
The ANC cannot indulge any major internal dispute, however morally significant. From start to finish in the long drawn-out scandal of Nkandla, where President Zuma only finally surrendered in the constitutional court, the ANC dummied up and closed ranks as always in a crisis. It was not so much to save President Zuma; it was to keep the party intact.
Last week dummying up ended abruptly. Mr Mcebisi Jonas created an uproar by revealing the Guptas had offered him the finance ministry. President Zuma was immediately at the centre of a climactic row as it became clear he must be guilty of putting the interests of business friends before his oath of office.
In case anyone was still in doubt about it, the Honourable Member Mosiuoa Lekota shouted out in the national assembly that President Zuma was no longer ‘honourable’ because of his conduct. Mr Lekota's performance has featured on TV almost every day since.
The party is in a terrible dilemma. The leadership knows beyond doubt that what
has is not a case of
state capture, but of Zuma capture. It isn’t the first time. Schabir Shaik and
his family captured Zuma; the ANC leadership had to manage his escape. But they
ignored all objections, and arguably the law, to elect Zuma as party president
and then to elect him again in parliament as state president. South Africa
Rank and file, parliamentary caucus, Cabinet, cronies and hangers-on are all trapped together in this and local elections are coming. President Zuma can only lend his face to these as a discredited leader, or not feature in them at all. Yet to replace him right now is as impossible as anything could be in politics.
The ANC leadership is falling back on the old stand-bys of shelving and smothering the issue. An exasperated ANC Secretary General Gwede Mantashe told insistent journalists over the weekend that the party’s National Executive Committee was under ‘no pressure’ even to consider recalling President Zuma. It seems he is safe for now.
What could be the break point to change that? Only the coming elections.
If the ANC do well, or even just okay in them, President Zuma could serve out his full term, not because he has support to spare anymore, but because it is very difficult, not to say dangerous, for the party to 'recall' a second president after the splits that followed former president Thabo Mbeki’s recall in 2008.
However a bad result, even without the ANC losing the major municipalities the opposition claim are up for grabs, would be fatal. An outright victory, a clear winner and loser, are not required for this. Elections are also measured by share of vote.
Mr Mantashe will be counting anxiously later this year, even if he can blame 'low turnout' for any fall off in the party's support. A low turnout is a favourite get-out for bad local election results.
Everything is where it should be to force change: in the hands of South African voters. Has their loyalty to the ANC been seriously dented at last? Has democracy been moving forwards underneath all these dramatic events, or does
remain, dangerously, a party-state
despite them? South