As if that weren’t enough, environments also change, and the life
varieties that survive over time are those naturally adapted to sustain their
existence - their 'life' - in changed conditions. Charles Darwin, who of course
introduced this mechanism to us all, called it ‘natural selection’ to
distinguish it from the artificial selection that people had already been doing
for ages. From tigers, pussy cats.
There is no known or apparent reason why the process of natural
selection is not at work in the Universe itself, or across the Multiverse if
that’s what the situation is.
Our Universe has certainly evolved or we wouldn’t be here. And
we’ve all heard as well of a primordial ‘soup’ that was around very early on.
If our Universe, in all its stunning complexity - galaxies, stars, planets,
tigers, cats and us - did not emerge out of that soup, we must explain what it
did emerge from, and how.
On that, more recent scientific theorising (itself constantly
‘evolving’) considers that the Universe is not necessarily running down like
some gigantic machine, as is generally supposed to be the case. That scenario,
faintly depressing however far off, is the result of entropy,* which means
everything runs from order to disorder and finally arrives at a featureless
state of equilibrium. Like the coffee in our picture, or the hot water left to
become tepid then cold in your bath.
The alternative proposal is that, provided a system is not
‘closed’ - that is, it continues to receive inputs of energy - the increase in
disorder spontaneously gives rise to new forms. And those that succeed are the
most stable, the forms naturally adapted to the environment.
Now the Universe that began with the Big Bang clearly did not
start out like it is today. In which case, entropy may not be death but
re-birth, midwife not undertaker, and this may be the way things are eternally.
That’s where, if S/He ever left, God
comes back in.
*Entropy is promulgated by the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Could
it have been repealed?
No comments:
Post a Comment